March 17, 2013
© 2013
My friend Caela is a pastor in Indiana. She and her husband David have two preschool boys. While watching his Mom read the news on the internet this week, three year old Maitland said, “Oh, I see the Pope! Pope Francis. He is a pastor, just like my mama.” Of course, he is too young to grasp the many layers of irony that make us laugh at his observation. Yet, making the connection between a married, woman Protestant pastor and the Pope surrounded by centuries of tradition and trappings is something of a metaphor for living between the past and the future.
Thanks to Randy for the update from the
Search and Call Committee today. Just as the election of a new Pope is a sign
that we are living between the past and the future, anticipating a new pastor
is an experience of living between the past and the future as a congregation.
We all knew from the beginning that as an
interim pastor I would be with you for a brief but important time. Realizing
that our time with you will be soon drawing to a conclusion, means that Candy
and I are also aware of living in a particular space between our past and our
future. We’ve begun to make lists of what we need to do here and in Dallas. After
Easter we’ll be with our son David’s family and with Candy’s Dad in Milwaukee
to dovetail future plans. I’ve had some inquiries for our next interim ministry
but don’t know where God will take us.
Today’s Scripture readings are about emerging
from the past so we can embrace the future. They can help us listen for God in
the spaces between past and future. They prepare us for God to reverse our
expectations.
Providing pastoral leadership and care while
the Search and Call Committee looks for another pastor is only part of the
ministry of an interim pastor. Equally important is creating a space between
pastors that insulates the new pastor from comparisons with the previous
pastor. In my time with you, I hope I have helped you listen for God in between
pastors.
Isaiah 40-55 was pointedly applicable to
Judah’s Babylonian Exile and prepared them to return to their homeland. 43:16-17
recalls God opening the Sea (of Reeds) so they could escape Egyptian slavery on
dry ground. But when they were captives in Babylon, a desert rather than a sea
was the barrier they would have to cross to get to freedom. Through the
prophet, God promised a reversal of the escape from Egypt. Instead of dry land
through the sea, God would make a river in the desert; instead of a pursuing
army, God would use a pagan King to launch and finance their return to the
Promised Land.
Isaiah 43:18-19 says, “Do not remember the
former things or consider the things of old. I am about to do a new thing.” Paul
was thoroughly familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures, so I wonder if he wasn’t
thinking of that when he wrote in Philippians 3:13 that he was “forgetting what
lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead.” For Paul, the reversal
was to relinquish the accumulation of his greatest religious credentials and
accomplishments for a future of knowing Christ and attaining the resurrection
of the dead. The space between Paul’s past and Paul’s future was to press on in
the power of Christ’s resurrection and the fellowship of Christ’s suffering.
The prophet asked Judah, “Do you not perceive
the new thing God is doing through you?” Seen from a New Testament perspective,
Judah’s return from Babylon was far greater than the Exodus from Egypt, as it
set in motion the coming of the Messiah. For Paul, relinquishing his own
righteousness was far eclipsed by receiving the righteousness of Christ. On a
congregational scale, I am convinced God is saying to this congregation, “In
your space between pastors, the future I have awaiting you will far exceed the
best of your past. I’m about to do a new thing. Can you not perceive it?”
Lent, also, is a space between the past and
the future. We look back at our spiritual struggles and wandering, and we look
ahead to redemption and resurrection. Lent is an annual reminder that we are
neither chained to our past nor fully living our future. In Luke’s Gospel,
we’ve been following Jesus through the spaces between his Galilean ministry and
his redemptive mission at the cross. Today we jump to John 12:1-8 for a
poignant, personal glimpse into one of those spaces. All four Gospels record a
woman anointing Jesus. Scholars love to debate the identity of the women and
the exact occasions of the anointings. That could be another fun Bible study,
but too detailed for a sermon. I will tell you this much. Matthew 26 and Mark
14 are almost certainly reporting the same incident. I believe Luke 7 was a
different woman much earlier in Jesus’ ministry. While I can’t prove it, I suspect
John 12 is the same woman and incident as Matthew and Mark, that John has told
in his own way of making the dramatic transition to the events of Holy Week.
Six
days before the Passover Jesus came to Bethany, the home of Lazarus, whom he
had raised from the dead. 2There
they gave a dinner for him. Martha served, and Lazarus was one of those at the
table with him. 3Mary took a pound of
costly perfume made of pure nard, anointed Jesus’ feet, and wiped them with her
hair. The house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. 4But
Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (the one who was about to betray him),
said, 5“Why was this perfume not sold for three
hundred denarii and the money given to the poor?” 6(He
said this not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief; he
kept the common purse and used to steal what was put into it.) 7Jesus
said, “Leave her alone. She bought it so that she might keep it for the day of
my burial. 8You always have the poor with you, but you
do not always have me.”
The dinner for Jesus at Bethany seemed to be
out of gratitude for the raising of Lazarus. Though unlikely that Mary bought
the perfume thinking of Jesus’ burial, he pointedly turned it into a stark precursor
of his death.
When Jesus quoted Deuteronomy 15:11 about
always having the poor, both the context of that verse and his own life,
preclude using it to rationalize withholding generosity from the poor. By
saying “you do not always have me,” he focused this occasion on his coming
death.
For Mary to anoint and let her hair down in
public to wipe the feet of a man who was not her husband was scandalous
intimacy. I have posted some art work that gives a sense of this at the QR code
or web address on the back of the bulletin. In these passages, I believe I hear
the voice of God in the spaces between the past and the future inviting us to a
similarly close relationship with Jesus.
In Isaiah 43:21, God called Judah “the people
I formed for myself so that they might declare my praise.” Each time we see
Mary of Bethany, she is an icon of deep closeness with Jesus: the dinner in
Luke 10:38-42, the death of her brother Lazarus in John 11:28-33 and the
anointing we read today.
When Paul wrote in Philippians 3:8, 10 that
he wanted to know Christ, he wasn’t thinking of a seminary degree. He wanted to
be so absorbed in Jesus that he could live every day by the power of Jesus’s
resurrection.
Paul also knew that for Jesus’ resurrection
to be his daily reality, not just a past event or future hope, he would also
share the fellowship of his suffering. To be with Jesus in the spaces between
the past and the future is to be with him wherever people suffer as you journey
toward the future with hope.
As we read that Paul pressed “on toward the
goal for the prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus,” we need to be
careful to realize he had not just replaced one form of human spiritual
exertion with another. Rather, like Paul we can be confident that Jesus has
made us his own, so as we live in the spaces between the past and the future,
we are increasingly congruent with Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment